Plan Comparison
Explore labelled fixture plans and their feasibility constraints.
On this page 6
Supplier consent status
no supplier acceptance recorded — Plan B variants are infeasible until the counterparty accepts via the Action History workflow. Consent is never pre-granted.
Feasibility under hypothetical terms is not authorization to execute. A proposed supplier extension is shown conditionally; recorded terms change only through the Action History workflow (explicit acceptance event).
Recorded forecast — current terms actual schedule
This is the forecast under recorded terms — what is actually scheduled. Plans below are hypothetical until executed through Action History.
Plan A — early partial collection feasible under hypothetical terms
Request USD 5,000 on 22 October 2026 with the remaining USD 3,000 on 5 November 2026. Payroll and all outflow dates stay unchanged.
What the plan changes
conditional on client paying the advanceUSD 5,000.00 on 2026-10-22
conditional on client paying the remainderUSD 3,000.00 on 2026-11-05
Required actions & permissions
- Client agreement to the advance (simulated counterparty)
Cost, disruption & conditional balances
Evaluation reasons
- All per-currency floors respected; no protected obligation moved; required consents present.
Assumptions
- Conditional on collection: projected receipts are not cash on hand. Actual balances are unchanged until receipts are observed and recorded.
- Intraday ordering unknown: outflows are applied before inflows on the same day (conservative). End-of-day balances are unaffected.
- Conditional on collection: projected receipts are not cash on hand. Actual balances are unchanged until receipts are observed and recorded.
When this plan fails
Fails if the client does not pay the USD 5,000 advance by 22 October 2026, or pays less. The forecast is conditional on collection — actual cash is unchanged until a receipt is recorded.
Review terms first. Draft creation does not make this plan feasible or establish approval, consent or payment.
Plan B (supplier move only) — insufficient infeasible
Move the USD 4,500 supplier payment to 6 November 2026.
What the plan changes
move to 2026-11-06
Consent: missing — no explicit acceptance eventUSD 4,500.00
Required actions & permissions
- Counterparty acceptance via an explicit runtime event (owner approval alone is insufficient)
Cost, disruption & conditional balances
Evaluation reasons
- supplier-001 date change requires an explicit counterparty acceptance event recorded at runtime; owner approval alone is insufficient and consent is never pre-granted. (cited: None)
Assumptions
- Conditional on the supplier's acceptance (no explicit acceptance event recorded yet); owner approval alone cannot change the supplier's terms.
When this plan fails
Fails without the supplier's explicit acceptance, and is insufficient even with it: the minimum stays at USD 2,500, below the USD 3,000 floor.
Review terms first. Draft creation does not make this plan feasible or establish approval, consent or payment.
Plan B — supplier move plus ops deferral infeasible
Move the USD 4,500 supplier payment to 6 November 2026 (counterparty acceptance required) and defer USD 500 of the 1,500 operations payment to 6 November 2026 (owner approval required), keeping USD 1,000 on 28 October.
What the plan changes
move to 2026-11-06
Consent: missing — no explicit acceptance eventUSD 4,500.00
split: USD 1,000.00 on 2026-10-28, USD 500.00 on 2026-11-06
Approval evidence: ev-ops-budgetUSD 1,500.00
Required actions & permissions
- Counterparty acceptance via an explicit runtime event (owner approval alone is insufficient)
- Owner approval (up to USD 500.00 deferrable)
Cost, disruption & conditional balances
Evaluation reasons
- supplier-001 date change requires an explicit counterparty acceptance event recorded at runtime; owner approval alone is insufficient and consent is never pre-granted. (cited: None)
Assumptions
- Conditional on the supplier's acceptance (no explicit acceptance event recorded yet) and the owner's approval of the ops deferral; owner approval alone cannot change the supplier's terms.
- Conditional on collection: projected receipts are not cash on hand. Actual balances are unchanged until receipts are observed and recorded.
When this plan fails
Fails if the supplier rejects the move, or the owner does not approve the USD 500 ops deferral. Recorded terms change only through the Action History workflow.
Review terms first. Draft creation does not make this plan feasible or establish approval, consent or payment.
Capped advance of 4000 feasible under hypothetical terms
Client advances at most 4000 on 2026-10-22; no payment dates change.
What the plan changes
conditional on client paying the advanceUSD 4,000.00 on 2026-10-22
Required actions & permissions
- Client agreement to the advance (simulated counterparty)
Cost, disruption & conditional balances
Evaluation reasons
- All per-currency floors respected; no protected obligation moved; required consents present.
Assumptions
- Conditional on collection: projected receipts are not cash on hand. Actual balances are unchanged until receipts are observed and recorded.
- Intraday ordering unknown: outflows are applied before inflows on the same day (conservative). End-of-day balances are unaffected.
- Conditional on collection: projected receipts are not cash on hand. Actual balances are unchanged until receipts are observed and recorded.
When this plan fails
Insufficient by design: a USD 4,000 advance alone leaves the minimum at USD 2,000, missing the floor by USD 1,000.
Review terms first. Draft creation does not make this plan feasible or establish approval, consent or payment.